You are here
Create a Proposal Approval Form (PAF) within your unit and via the eResearch Proposal Management (eRPM) system. Once internally complete and correct, route to ORSP for submission four days in advance of the sponsor deadline.
Proposal development begins in the departments and units and at University of Michigan we use the eResearch Proposal Management (eRPM) system. Proposal submission happens with ORSP.
Any research or scholarly project proposal with outside funding must be processed through ORSP. Federal, State, and U-M policies and regulations guide the processing of proposals and submission to a potential sponsor, as well as the subsequent handling of projects resulting from successful proposals.
Proposal Approval Form (PAF)
The PAF is completed and routed electronically with each proposal in eRPM. The person submitting a proposal must obtain approval of the appropriate Department Head and Dean or Unit Director before sending the proposal to ORSP. More detail about what is covered by the PAF is available, as is information on routing the PAF in the eResearch Proposal Management system.
Services provided by ORSP
Once your PAF is finalized (and complete and correct), you can route to ORSP. ORSP will then:
- review the proposal according to our PAF and Proposal Checklist;
- route the completed proposal, the PAF, and necessary accompanying documents to the appropriate University offices for the required endorsements, signatures, and certifications, and
- submit to the potential sponsor.
ORSP requires a finalized PAF and final proposal four business days before the sponsor deadline and time.
See the Standard Operating Procedure 200.01 on Proposal Review by ORSP for further guidance.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures
When the PAF is first submitted for approval, the project director must determine if a financial conflict of interest disclosure is required. The conflict of interest disclosure asks about management or financial interests in outside entities held by key investigators or by their spouses or dependents that may impinge upon the proposed sponsored agreement. To assure full disclosure, this requirement should be interpreted broadly. See Conflict of Interest and Commitment for further instructions.
If the disclosures are negative (that is, if it is determined there are no "significant financial interests" related to the proposed project), the Project Director will so certify by signing the Proposal Approval Form (PAF) in eRPM. The proposal and the PAF will then be further processed.
Note the procedures for proposals with sponsors following the Public Health Service Financial Conflict of Interest regulations.
Disclosures that may trigger State Law or are otherwise above the threshold of significant financial interests must be forwarded, along with a copy of the PAF, for review by the Conflict of Interest Review Committee. Proposals may be submitted to external sponsors in order to meet established deadlines with the understanding that the review process must be completed satisfactorily before a sponsored award can be accepted.
All Sponsored Projects Must be Submitted through ORSP via eRPM
The proposal is routed through the University of Michigan via the eRPM system with an accompanying Proposal Approval Form (PAF), created in eRPM, which documents university commitments to the project at each level from the department to the central administration.
Below are questions you might encounter when submitting your project through eRPM. After you have developed your proposal with your project team, a best practice is to submit it to ORSP at least four business days in advance of the deadline for a thorough review.
Processing the Proposal
ORSP must do the actual submission. The proposal is submitted in a system-to-system process (eResearch >> grants.gov) by ORSP. In some cases, an office with delegated authority can submit directly to grants.gov (e.g., the Medical School Grants Office that can submit to NIH only). To get the proposal submitted, it is the responsibility of the project team to finalize their submission in eResearch. ***We recommend submitting to ORSP four business days prior to the sponsor deadline, but only if it's final.***
To submit a proposal to a sponsor, you will use a Proposal Approval Form (PAF). Be sure to identify and work with your department research administrator. To find your administrator, visit the Blue Pages. To complete the PAF and sponsor application materials via eResearch (eRPM). A best practice is to check the Proposal Routine Checklist created by the Research Administration Schools (RASC) Committee.
No. Individual Principal Investigator registration in Grants.gov is not required. The University is fully registered for the Grants.gov submission process.
Agency-specific registration is sometimes required. Principal Investigators are required to register for many agency-specific sytems. Some are listed below:
As always, contact your department administrator first with any questions. To find your administrator, visit the Blue Pages.
An SF-424 form, or "Standard Form 424," is the application packet used by federal agencies for grant submissions. Most standard information (DUNS, EIN, FWA numbers, etc.) is pre-populated in the required SF-424 forms when completing the application in eResearch (eRPM). If you find your application is not supported by eResearch you can find the standard information on the Frequently Required Proposal Data web page.
In order to give your proposal a full review it is strongly recommended that you deliver it in final form within four (4) business days of the sponsor deadline. We will do what we can given the shortened time frame, but you run the risk of a submission that fails to pass the Grants.gov and agency validations. When a proposal is routed late we make every effort to execute it, but we mark it as "Insufficient Time for Review."
Yes, you can find workshop information here. However, most research administration workshops are currently postponed while we reevaluate and assess training. If you have questions, or if you have suggestions for other training, please contact David Mulder, Training Manger (email@example.com). Thank you!
ORSP recommends using Grants.gov system-to-system submission (or other agency systems such as NSF's Fastlane or a unique sponsor system) whenever possible. This is integrated in the University of Michigan eResearch system. Note that some agencies specify that paper applications are required, and some will require only Adobe. Those are the only circumstances in which system-to-system should not be used.
No, ORSP project representatives can provide guidance, but your first point-of-contact is your department administrator who can help with system and forms.
Check the Resubmission application (Box 2) and enter the previously submitted NIH grant number (such as GM123456) in Box 4.
No, not through grants.gov.
The Principal Investigator (PI) may be able to access this information using his/her login credentials for NIH eRA Commons or NSF Fastlane (or others). The status information that is available will vary from agency to agency.
eRPM provides status on proposal submission for proposals submitted via system-to-system. To check the content of your electronically submitted proposal for selected agencies including NIH, use eRA Commons. For NSF, submitted proposals can be viewed in FastLane.
No, you can't change the order.
When on the Research....(see screenshot ) page. Upload the additional Additional Key/Senior Profiles by selecting the button on the lower left.
As always, contact your department administrator first with any questions. For technical questions in eResearch, call 4-HELP.